Posted on Fri Aug 24 01:20:53 2007
by exiftoolin response to 5941
Re: Difference 0x9211 - 0xa211 (ImageNumber)
A number of tags between 0x92XX and 0xa2XX have changed
their tag ID's at some point in time. Rather than give these different
tag names to allow them to be differentiated, I have left the tag
names the same and only made one of them writable. The
one I have made writable is the one I have found to be the
more common of the two, although in general these tags are
not very commonly used to begin with.
Posted on Fri Aug 24 01:40:01 2007
by linuxuserin response to 5943
Re: Difference 0x9211 - 0xa211 (ImageNumber)
Please change the names, as already mentioned in my other posting, I have problems. It would be very nice, if I could test it in a preversion. If this doens't work for me I can't go on with my bash script.
Posted on Fri Aug 24 14:43:39 2007
by exiftoolin response to 5945
Re: Difference 0x9211 - 0xa211 (ImageNumber)
I hesitate to change tag names for reasons of backward compatibility.
Instead, you can easily override the existing definitions by adding
a user-defined tag with whatever name you want.
(4)
]
